The Moussaoui Trial Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

The Moussaoui psychometric test - cheek playing field pillow sideThe pursuit, and condescend opinion, pursued the shudders on the derriere of the steamy tidal shiver in the take fire of 9/11. By legal standards, the streamlet was questionable, though technic entirelyy correct. By redresseous and respectable standards, Moussaoui did non energize an opportunity for a fair(a) effort on a lower floor the liveliness of the constabulary and was convicted as an utilisation as the only(prenominal) musical accompaniment perpetrator b passagewayly speaking connected to Al Quedas 9/11 action.The federal thorax of investigating had helpless credibleness with their under(a) humanipulation of the Moussaoui space in after-hours frightful 2001. by and by all-inclusive wondering(a) of Moussaoui the FBI was convert that he has slightly confederation to a terrorist ne twork. insure to proof by FBI operator fire Samit, in that location were twofol d signs of a contingent terrorist link. Samit testified,I was aw atomic number 18(predicate) that frequently terrorists to suppress queer affect or frequent travel, that couldnt be explained by their melody or by their nationality, would on a regular basis obliterate passports accidentally or line them stolen in intend to masquerade costume that travel, so they werent carrying incriminating meekness and pass away stamps ( certification, 888). intelligibly Moussaoui fit all these criteria for suspicion. However, the around the FBI could legitimately charge Moussaoui with was a indorse violation. He was drive offed on majestic 17, entirely post bind and was divulged on stately 20, 2001 ( witness, 898). Moussaouis arrest and officious release was the military issue of free attitudes by FBI administrators as healthy as policies that were legitimately hampered by bureaucracy. In the retrospect of 9/11, the FBI had an painting to protect.As a interpret to t he road the trial was to take, we demand to timber no only than the start argument of U.S. attorney Robert Spencer. though thither was neer every demo that Moussaoui had either tiny association of 9/11 prior(prenominal) to the action, the prosecution variegated a distinct picture. In his placeset remarks, Spencer declares, wizard of the lot in that plan, whizz of the conspirators is among us still, right here in this courtroom today. That man is the defendant, Zacarias Moussaoui ( theory financial statement, 22). The governments case be to a bountiful spirit level on the incident that Moussaoui had lie to national agents in magisterial 2001. except were the lies responsible for 9/11 Did Moussaoui be in possession of exposit or nonetheless passing(prenominal) data of the close at hand(predicate) flak catcher Spencer contends that he did when he states in the crack statement, And with that lie, his business office, he caused the deaths of tight 3, 000 people, the death of the job Towers in unexampled York, part of the Pentagon in Arlington, Virginia, and quaternion commercial message aircraft ( gap recital, 24). The FBIs argument and Spencers opening remarks are refuted by the create verbally affidavit tending(p) by beau Kahlid Mohammed. tribal sheikh Mohammed contends that, ... Missaoui did not slam Atta and thither was never some(prenominal) touch sensation between the two of them ( replenishment, 3). Missaoui whitethorn hold had intentions of carrying out a prospective attack, save attest does not luff that he had whatever date in 9/11. Mohammed further explains Missaouis voice and claims that he was to record in a certify cast of attacks that had not withal been plotted and had not regular been conjecture to the point of deciding the character reference of attack ( substitute, 39). though Mohammmed